requestId:684c3e1b2d47e8.72989282.
Zhu Zi’s body usage commentary*
Author: Tian Feng
Source: Author Authorized Confucian Network Published
Original from “Zhu Zi’s Journal” Issue 1, 2018
Time: Confucius was in the 2570s, the sixth day of the fourth month of the Gengzi period, Xinwei
� The former is important to apply it to natural or logical normative meanings, and its classical form is “one difference in principle” and “two quatrains of Taiyang and four symbols and eight trigrams”; the latter gives people a space to imitate and participate in the Liuhe. The mediation form is based on the former that has practical meanings. This subject becomes the one who always exists in the physical sequence chain, and in the actual physical application relationship, it is the real “body”.
Keywords:Use one source; Taoism; theory is different; mind is the main; mediation;
The usage of Zhu Xi’s concept of “use of body” is very broad. Teacher Chen Rongjie summarized Zhu Xi’s discussion on the following six aspects: there are differences in physical use, and the use of body is not separated. The use of one source is one, and the use of body is unstable, and the use of body is different [1]. The first three aspects are directly inherited from Yichuan, while the last three aspects are actually a unified problem, namely the relative nature of the use. This method of distinction is not actually suitable for discussion on the issue of physical application, because the meanings of physical application are very different on the different levels. This article first discusses Zhu Xi’s three differences in the different meanings of the three different meanings of directors, Taoism, and personality, and then tries to translate them into conclusions.
① Director and body use
Reason problem is a question that Zhu Zi has been working hard to discuss throughout his life. Although he inherited the purpose of Yichuan’s basic design and believed that theory has a positive attitude. There is a standardization effect, but Zhu Zi rarely uses the concept of physical application to regulate theorems. This is because Zhu Zi’s understanding of physical application focuses more on practical meaning, that is, there must be a way to participate in the physical application relationship [2]. The simple natural transformation process cannot be called physical application. The reason for the atmosphere and has a specific influence on it. This is not a use. It must be called a use by someone who relies on the principles to carry out certain activities. Teacher Meng Peiyuan said: “The relationship between reason and things is the relationship between the body and effectiveness and influence, not the relationship between the body and the phenomenon mentioned by Oriental Philosophy. This is why we use relationships to explain the relationship between reason and atmosphere. … Although Zhu Zi followed the “Book of Changes” and “Zhou Yi Cheng’s Translation” The word “elephant” in it, however, “elephant” actually represents all things that are born from the air. Zhu Zi used reason as his body and used image (that is, object and atmosphere) to clearly point out that reason and object (gas) are the relationship between the body and the effect. “[3] There is no problem in saying that reason and things are not the relationship between the body and the phenomenon, butIt is incorrect to mix the atmosphere, objects and images into one discussion [4]. Zhu Zi’s confirmation was also used to describe the relationship between theory and theory, but this was based on his early thought that principles could be thrilled. His old age no longer believed that principles could be thrilled [5], so he could not easily apply the relationship between theory and theory. Zhu Zi only used rational images or physical objects and physical usage, and rarely used them in terms of atmosphere, because a pure atmosphere is not ineffective as a use. The rational atmosphere is originally two things, and the physical usage relationship discusses the two sides of a thing, or perhaps the most basic relationship between two things belonging to a higher system. Things in the ordinary meaning are composed of rational systems, so the rational relationship that separates things cannot be called physical usage, and things, objects or images are discussed in a physical framework. Indeed, Zhu Zi’s discussions cannot be separated from the norm, but it is common to think of the rational relationship directly to the physical relationship.
To the physical and physical objects, it is as follows: “‘The body uses one source’, although the body is not strong, it is already effective. ‘The microscopic and there is no gap’, and there is no gap in the middle. The six combinations have not existed, and all things have been included. This is effective in the body; once the six combinations are established, this principle also exists, and this is the microscopic and there is no gap in the middle.” The things here already refer to the principles of all things, and each thing has the principles of one thing. This principle exists before the specific things and stipulates the feelings of this thing. This is still the luggage he helped to carry when she entered school. He also wanted to use her “standard” meaning in terms of meaning. The use of concepts for theory and things is very rare in Zhu Zi, and it seems that it is still more in the need to comment on the previous words. What Zhu Zi often sees is to discuss the director using concepts:
“It is said that the body uses one original, so that the principle of subtleness is invisible and without words, and all the images are already clear. It says that the phenomenon of subtleness is invisible and without any trace, so that the image of the attachment is invisible and is the thing, and this principle is nothing. It is said that the principle should be first used and then used. The principle of using the body is already , the reason is that it is a one origin. Talking about things first appears and then subtle. The thing is visible and the body of things can be seen, so it is uninterrupted. However, what is called a one origin is a long and rough sequence of words! ”[6]
Zhu Zi’s passage divides “the body uses a source to show the microscopicness and no gap” into two levels, theory and image (things, things). “There is no sign of the world, and all images are already obvious” does not mean that things have truly existed, but that although specific things have not yet appeared, all the things that can be used in nature have been “reasonable”, that is, “body” is stipulated, which means “body use one original”. It is said later: “The reason should be first used and then used. The principle of using the body and using it is already possessed, so it is a basis.” [7] As mentioned in the previous article, since the use of the body should be two sides of a thing, the principle of things is the body, and the level of the atmosphere of things is the use. Similarly, “small and uninterrupted” emphasizes that no matter what we discuss, there is always “reason” in it, and the matter and reason are not intertwined and uncomplicated. Finally, Zhu Zi emphasized that as far as the director is concerned, although “one root” and “no place”, the order of the order is rough and small, it will not be difficult to reverse. Finally, I emphasize the sequence of problems because this passage comes fromThe purpose of Zhu Xi’s “Additional Explanation” is to reflect the various doubts caused by the “Additional Explanation” of “Additional Explanation”: “Since this is my opinion, the reader is ill of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the problem of the