requestId:684c3e5461e460.72127620.
Genetics, nationalities and countries—Kang Youwei and Zhang Taiyan’s disagreement about the modern country of tree establishment
Author: Gan Chunsong
Source: “Confucius Research” Issue 4, 2021
Excerpt: Victor Fans discovered that she was wearing a marriage on her finger in a photo of ejaculation. After the new ring movement was defeated, Kang Youwei and Zhang Taiyan had a conflict on how to establish a modern country: First of all, in terms of the problems of the ethnic group, Kang Youyi adopted the “civilized ethnic group” to advocate the integration of Han and provide the new country with a practical ethnic group’s strength; Zhang Taiyan adhered to the “historical ethnic group” and emphasized the differences in history, and Han people should be the main body of the new country. Secondly, in terms of reaction problems, Kang You, in order to develop from the III of Gongyang School, believed that the rebellious people were the state of the future society, and the situation in China was only suitable for the monarch’s slander; Zhang Taiyan borrowed the revenge argument of Gongyang School, and argued that reversal was the best way to establish a country. After Kang Zhang’s battle, Zhang Taiyan was guilty of his words. During the army, he completed the “reform of the customs” thinking, and participated in more transcendent value thinking on the real strategy of reflecting on the construction of the country. In the exploring of fantasy society, Zhang Taiyan surpasses the five racialist opinions, and has great differences in goals with the argument of King Kang.
Keywords: Kang Youwei; Zhang Taiyan; Big and Big; Five Essentials;
Author Introduction: Gan Chunsong, male, born in 1965, from Shuxing, Zhejiang, professor of the Department of Philosophy in Beijing, vice president of the Confucian Research Institute, doctoral supervisor, important research and development goals are Confucian philosophy, modern thinking civilization, etc.
1. From “The Trinity” to the fullest: the breaking between Zhang Taiyan and the New School
Zhang Taiyan said that he had established revengeful thoughts since he was a child, but he never suffered from the influence of New Thoughts until the end of the 19th century, just like he acknowledged the fairness of the “The Trinity”. The defeat of Vixin’s movement and the absurd performance of the Qing Dynasty later made his hatred and satisfaction buried in his heart stimulated. The change of the ambition was the “National Conference” he participated in in 1900 with Tang Caichang on July 26 and 29. This conference recommended that it be the president and the vice president, and Tang Cai served as the permanent director. The theme of this “national association” is full of conflicting initiatives, such as enhancing the preservation of China’s authority and territory, not accepting the right to govern China by the Qing Dynasty, but also asking the Emperor Guangxi to revive it. These contradictions also reflect the dilemma of the new thinkingists in choosing between the new order and the old emperor. Zhang Taiyan joined this organization and cut off his seeds, showing his “unjustice to the continent” position, and then a break with Kang Youwei’s royal party. Liang Qichao, who is in the new camp, moved several times during this period. There was a part of Kang You who was in a rapid career and directly joined the counter-sects for the students. In this regard, Kang You tried to control the pictureLiang Qichao, Ou Jia and others came to stop the stand-up internal battles in Kangmen. He warned Liang Qi to super people that if we abandon our glory, it would be disobedient; if you change me, it would be disobedient. If you want to surrender to the rebels, he can only issue a public declaration and break with the door. To this end, Liang Qichao returned to the imperial court. He published the “Tractice of China’s Weakness” in the “Qing Dynasty” under his jurisdiction, reviving Kang You’s strategy to point the spear at Cixi. He believed that China’s backwardness was important because of the power of Cixi and others. If he could add his power to the glorious emperor, he could be weakened as an achievement. Strong. Zhang Taiyan believed that Liang Qichao was wronged by the teacher and did not understand the truth. Regarding the “Tracking of China’s Weakness”, Zhang Taiyan wrote “The Confucian Commitment” (published in the “National News” on August 10, 1901). From the perspective of content and specificity, it can be seen that Kang Youwei and Zhang Taiyan had a prelude to the dispute over reaction between Kang Youwei and Zhang Taiyan in 1903. In the article “The Confucian Commitment Book”, Zhang Taiyan used the text in “The Confucian Commitment Book”.
In “The Comprehensive Anthology of the Evil”, Zhang Taiyan pointed out that the reason why he took the initiative to rebel was because of “the interest of reason.” He emphasized: Ranking is not to report personal grudges with the mainland, but to respond to the historical tide. He said that during the long Qing Dynasty, the Man tribes massacred, burned, and bound the Han tribes, while the Yi and the Group confessed that the Man tribe rulers had no talent to lead the country out of the predicament, so they should be overthrown by counter-attack. Reaction is the justification of society rather than the resurrection of “private enemies” of the Han people.
Zhang Taiyan responded to Liang Qichao’s argument. He said that Guangxian was not the kind of holy lord that Liang Qichao described, and the transformation carried out by Guangxian was not really for the benefit of the people, but for the reinforcing of the whole tribe. Since the establishment of the Qing Dynasty, there has been no unity between the whole Han Dynasty. If the full tribe is not dismissed, it is impossible to make the country cohesive. He particularly opposed Liang Qichao’s approach to using the example of the lack of heirs in European monarchs and the establishment of foreign nationalities as an example to illustrate the justice of alien rule. Although in the “The Trinity”, he himself quoted similar examples. At this time, he began to reflect on the once-proposed “Trium”. From the phenomenon of not supporting the Qing Dynasty during the Boxer Rebellion, he recommended: “The whole continent is not chasing, and the people who want to love the country, and the enemy who are approachable will not be able to achieve it.” [2] Therefore, in the new version of “The Book of the Book”, I went to the article “The Trinity”.
Zhang Taiyan took a step forward and let the erectile dynasty return to the northeast of their original careers and restore Huaxia to the Han country. He combined his honours as “protecting life but not protecting rights”. This statement refers to the term “protecting China but not protecting the Qing Dynasty” proposed by Kang Youyi before the Reform Commission for the establishment of the National Security Council. Zhang Taiyan said that since Kang and Liang had the attitude of “protecting China but not the Qing Dynasty”, it shows that they also had gaps with the power of the Qing emperor. Zhang Taiyan finally said that whether the truth depends on whether it canIf you can establish your power, you will not be able to rely on the emperor’s hope of establishing your worries. The monarch’s establishment of a slander is a mutually conflicting goal. Kang Liang’s real idea is not to establish a slander, but to “loyalty to the emperor” and conquer [3].
In short, Zhang Taiyan believes that since the Qing Dynasty has no ability to resist external enemies, it is difficult to become the focus of gathering the atmosphere, so he must take rush as a reaction, otherwise the country will eventually become a slave to Europe and the United States.
“The Constitution of Revenge” is the first article of modern counter-party criticism of the reformists. At this stage, Kang Youyi published articles such as “Answering the Chinese Businesses in North and South America that China can only be viable and cannot act as a reaction”, and continued to develop his improvement, nationalism and ideas for the future of China. Zhang Taiyan wrote “Reactionary Book of Kang You for Discussion” to systematically respond to Kang You for political position. Zhang Taiyan took the initiative to rebel and oppose the royal family, and used the historical ethnic group to govern Kang to have a civilized and civilized ethnic group’s concept. In the field of thinking, we continue to criticize the modern literature, which is the basis of thinking of the reform school. The publication of the article and subsequent systems have enabled Zhang’s articles to be widely spread and expanded the influence of the reactionaries.
2. National Picture of the National People in the View of “Civilized People” and “Historical People”
In “Answer the Chinese Businesses in North and South America that China can only be feasible and cannot act in a reaction”, Kang You focused on solving the “North and South American Resolution” problem brought by the “North and South American Resolution” problem. This problem is of great importance in modern China. When modern ethnic countries contemplate the Chinese nation’s view